The debate on classroom discipline has intensified, with parents, educators, and scholars discussing the potential benefits of reintroducing “old-school” methods to address disruptive behavior. This conversation gained traction following a senate inquiry into classroom conduct, which recommended a return to traditional disciplinary approaches as a potential solution.

These newly implemented nationwide guidelines emphasize teaching students basic behaviors such as entering classrooms properly, sitting correctly, and asking questions respectfully. Classrooms are being arranged with desks in rows facing the teacher to promote a structured learning environment. Additionally, students are encouraged to practice “super walking,” a technique aimed at promoting orderly movement throughout the school. These measures aim to instill discipline and create a conducive learning atmosphere.

The push for these disciplinary measures stems from research conducted by the Australian Education Research Organisation (AERO), which found that teachers spend around 20% of their time managing disruptive behavior. Dr. Jenny Donavan, CEO of AERO, stressed the importance of explicitly teaching appropriate behavior, noting the strong correlation between classroom conduct and academic success.

While the idea has received mixed reactions among teachers, former principal Tracy Tully shared on the Today show, “Teaching discipline is really basic information, and every school should already be doing it. This will definitely work – the very first thing that needs to happen when teaching a lesson is that the teachers are there on time, they line the kids up outside the classroom, and they tell them what they’re going to do and how they want them to enter.”

Tully added, “There is nothing difficult about it. The problem is now it’s been out of control for so many decades, they need to bring it back in, and they can do it. They just need the support of the schools and the support from the regional councils.”

Dr. Donavan emphasized the importance of consistency in teaching and practicing these behaviors throughout a student’s educational journey, highlighting that these skills are essential for effective classroom management.

Parents have also voiced their opinions, with some attributing the problem to inadequate discipline at home. Others support the reintroduction of strict disciplinary measures in schools as a necessary step to address disrespect and unruliness among students.

“I think you need to cane the parents, to be honest. That’s where it is at for me. Kids are a product of their mum and dad or their parents… discipline starts at home,” one parent said. “They need to be taught to listen and learn to take direction. Just no respect in the classroom. That’s the biggest problem,” another added.

While the debate continues, it is evident that there is no one-size-fits-all solution to addressing disruptive behavior in classrooms. The key lies in balancing modern teaching techniques with traditional disciplinary measures while fostering a supportive learning environment that encourages respect and responsibility among students. As educators, parents, and policymakers navigate this challenging terrain, collaboration and open dialogue will be crucial in shaping the future of education in Australia. Will the US follow suit, or are we not ready for that discussion yet?